Save Our Public Lands

March 22 was a good turnout for SAVING OUR PUBLIC LANDS.

The Boise BCH was front and center! Keep up the good work!

per: CBS2 News:

On Saturday, Idahoans from across the state gathered at the Idaho Capitol to rally in support of public lands and oppose their privatization by special interests.

The event aimed to urge state leaders to safeguard these lands, which are integral to Idaho’s identity and economy, according to organizers.

“Idaho’s 32 million acres of public lands are the foundation of Idaho’s unique way of life and Idaho’s economy,” said John Robison, Public Lands & Wildlife Director for the Idaho Conservation League. “We live in Idaho for the freedom of enjoying our public lands—and the chance to pass this heritage on to our families and future generations.”

Public lands play a crucial role in Idaho’s economy, with outdoor recreation supporting over 37,000 jobs and contributing $3.96 billion in 2023. However, these lands face significant threats, including forest health issues, wildfire risks, and development pressures. Budget cuts and staffing shortages further strain the management of these lands.

“The future of our public lands is in jeopardy. Now is the time for our leaders to reject these dangerous efforts and make it clear that we will not follow the path toward privatization,” said Alexis Pickering, Executive Director for Conservation Voters for Idaho.

The rally, which began at 11 a.m., featured a range of speakers, including Representative Monica Church and actor Chance Rush, known for his role in “Killers of the Flower Moon.” Other speakers included Paul Mascuch, an Idaho falconer, and representatives from hunting interests.

IDAHO’S RESPONCE (to public lands)

January 23, 2025 Good morning,

Thank you so much for your recent letter concerning the State of Utah’s lawsuit that our office supported over the federal ownership of undesignated Bureau of Land Management lands in our western states.   Many people contacted my office with letters of support, opposition, and general interest on the topic and I am grateful for the widespread engagement on this important issue.

On Monday, January 13, the United States Supreme Court declined to hear this case, so for now, this case regarding undesignated BLM lands is on hold.  However, the conversation about federalism, public recreation access, and management practices is one that our state and country need to have.  Regardless of your position, I am thankful for your communication and hope you stay engaged as we set priorities for Idaho lands together. 

I recently put out a newsletter on this topic and have included a link below.  It articulates my position as well as my concerns regarding federal ownership of Idaho lands and their management practices. It may address some of the concerns and correct some of the misinformation that was spread about the Utah lawsuit.

Labrador Letter – Idaho Lands in Idaho Hands

Again, thank you for reaching out on this important issue. 

Best regards,
        

Help Save Our Public Lands

Keep the message short (They don’t want personal details)

Tell them:

  1. You don’t support the release of public managed lands from the BLM to the State of Idaho.
  2. This land is where we recreate; Camping, Riding, Fishing, et. Look at how much revenue is spent on this activity in Idaho.
  3. The state cant afford to manage the land.
  4. If they support this, don’t count on a vote at the next election.

Go to “Your Legislator” tab to get phone numbers and addresses.

UPDATE – More bad news on Public Lands – 1/8/2025

Received this from Karen Steenhof:

The State of Utah filed a motion to the Supreme Court, bypassing the District Court, asking that all “unappropriated” federal lands be turned over to the state.  Attorney General Raul Labrador filed an Amicus brief on behalf of Idaho, supporting Utah’s motion.  The Supreme Court will hear arguments on Friday January 10 and will decide on January 13 whether to take the case.  If they don’t, that won’t be the end because will probably go back to the District Court.   So, it is still important to speak up and contact Congressional representatives as well as Idaho legislators about how important it is to keep public lands in public hands.

Unappropriated lands include lands were not reserved for another purpose (i.e., a National Park, National Forest, National Monument, National Wildlife Refuge, or other designation like National Conservation Area).  Unappropriated lands comprise 9 million acres in Idaho—17% of all land in Idaho.

If the state gets title to unappropriated lands, it would not be able to afford what it takes to manage them.  The firefighting responsibilities alone would bankrupt the state, so they would be forced to sell off the lands or lease them to the highest bidders.  Privatizing the lands would eliminate public access for trail riding, hunting, fishing, hiking etc.

The comments recommended by ICL here: https://takeaction.idahoconservation.org/09a2aFx  are good.  My understanding is that going through this portal will get comments to Labrador, the Congressional delegation, and Idaho legislators.

Here is more information about the situation:  https://idahoconservation.org/blog/utah-files-the-big-one-lawsuit-seeks-to-seize-18-5-million-acres-of-public-land/  We can hope that the Supreme Court will dismiss Utah’s case, given that language in the Utah, Idaho, and other western states’ constitutions and statehood acts “forever disclaim[ed] all right and title to the unappropriated public lands lying within…”

I know that all of us have been frustrated by various BLM decisions and actions, but we can’t toss out everything because of a few bad decisions.

Bad News on Idaho’s Public Lands – 1/2/2025

Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador has submitted a brief to the U.S. Supreme Court supporting Utah’s latest attempt to take millions of acres of public land out of the control of Congress and instead have the Supreme Court designate other managers. The Attorney General is also asking the Supreme Court to declare the landmark 1976 law (FLPMA) that directs BLM to manage public lands for multiple use and sustained yield unconstitutional. 

In his brief, the Attorney General specifically called out for the transfer of 9 million acres of “unappropriated” BLM lands in Idaho. These are the classic BLM “multiple use, sustained yield lands” that make up the over 9 million acres of Idaho or 77% of BLM lands in the state. These are the same lands where Idahoans go to fill out their elk tag, go bird hunting, collect firewood for the winter, ride trails, and take their families camping. All it will take is for five of the nine justices to agree and Idaho’s heritage and our way of life could be lost forever. For example, State ownership would open the door to privatization, jeopardizing lands we use as a source of clean water for our communities, hunting, fishing, and recreation. We need you to speak up today – tell our decision-makers that you do not support this stance.

2024 Fall Non-Motorized Trails Summit Invite

(From Daniel Waugh , Idaho Horse Council)

Hello,

I want to officially invite you to the 2024 Fall Non-Motorized Trails Summit on Nov 6th at 2pm. The summit will be held at the main conference room at IDPR at 5657 Warm Springs Ave Boise, Id 83716. Additionally, the Idaho Horse Council will hold a zoom meeting for those unable to attend in person. 

The Director of IDPR would like to discuss our draft legislation with all of us. Additionally I know I have spoken to many of you about possible presentations for your organizations. If you have something you would like to present, get with me and I will add you to the agenda. I will send the agenda as soon as it is finalized. I believe this is a great venue to share projects or ideas and collaborate with each other. 

I apologize for the date change in advance, but it is increasingly difficult to schedule around so many organizations and peoples schedules, however many of us felt it necessary for certain entities to be able to attend in person and discuss this with us. 

If you cannot attend we will record this and share the link to watch after the event.

Idaho Horse Council Administrator is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.
Topic: 2023 Fall Non-Motorized Trails Summit
Time: Nov 6, 2023 02:00 PM Mountain Time (US and Canada)

Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83583672887?pwd=RURLK2dEdjVlTGk3MlY4WkIzNjA2dz09

Meeting ID: 835 8367 2887
Passcode: 096665

One tap mobile
+12532158782,,83583672887#,,,,*096665# US (Tacoma)
+13462487799,,83583672887#,,,,*096665# US (Houston)

Dial by your location
• +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
• +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
• +1 669 444 9171 US
• +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose)
• +1 719 359 4580 US
• +1 253 205 0468 US
• +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)
• +1 305 224 1968 US
• +1 309 205 3325 US
• +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
• +1 360 209 5623 US
• +1 386 347 5053 US
• +1 507 473 4847 US
• +1 564 217 2000 US
• +1 646 558 8656 US (New York)
• +1 646 931 3860 US
• +1 689 278 1000 US

Meeting ID: 835 8367 2887
Passcode: 096665

Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kevE8IGp8z

How to be notified of HOT TOPIC updates..

You will be given the opportunity to opt out of the notifications once you come to our web site and every 30 days thereafter.

Notifications are indicated by a BELL and some verbiage about the document with a link to the page. by clicking on the notification window , you will be taken the that updated page.

It does work on popular browsers (such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari, etc.) at this time.

Non standard browsers such as Brave will not show update notifications without some modifications to our web site. This may be done in the future.

  • Edge gives you the freedom to control notifications and requests alike by:
    • Navigate to Settings > Cookies and site permissions > Notifications and turn off the toggle to disable all notification requests.
    • Navigate to Settings > Cookies and site permissions > All sites to set notification settings for individual websites.

USFS Southern Region Proposal for Increases in Camping and Trail Use Fees Link to USFS Web site.)

Proposal for Increases in Trail Use Fees. Ability to make comments has been closed, but you can still read about proposal. (Site Link)

Here is a brief recap of the proposal and how it will affect areas throughout:

  • A $10 fee would be good for three consecutive days. You would also be able to purchase a $60 annual forest-wide pass or an $80 “America the Beautiful” pass, which covers all federal recreation fee areas across the country, including national forests in the other states.
  • The fee would apply to locations with developed amenities like toilets, picnic tables, parking, fishing access and trash collection.
  • Money would be deposited into steel tubes similar to those already in place. 
  • It is estimated the program would raise an additional $1 million per year. 95% of the fees paid would remain with the forest and be used to maintain the sites and facilities and could be leveraged into grants to improve trailheads and surrounding areas, according to a Forest Supervisor. 

There are concerns.

These concerns include:

  • Selecting only certain sites to be fee-based could potentially push users to non-fee sites that could intensify use in the areas accessed by those sites where avalanche danger is greater and there are fewer parking spaces.
  • Where does enforcement start and end in places where roadside parking acts as overflow. Will more roadside parking be the result?
  • Will snow removal costs be used from the generated funds?  
  • Has a sno-park permit system been considered such as those in CaliforniaIdahoOregon and Washington?
  • How do we ensure “America the Beautiful” pass fees support local sites?
  • Passes are for single vehicles; how do multiple car households manage a single pass?
  • Will the fees collected allow the USFS to permit shuttle companies to drop off and pick up people to help reduce congestion and parking conflicts in the canyons? 
  • The LCC EIS outcome remains uncertain and tolling is a component of either preferred alternative; how does tolling affect the fee proposal? Will the USFS be the beneficiary of some portion of those funds? Will users be charged twice?
  • Will there be more toilets at trailheads, or out in the popular drainages?
  • We would like to see at least a partial – ideally a full – summary or proposal of where the local FS Ranger District will target spending these new funds.  

See: Idaho Horse Council Activity under HOT TOPICS for more info.